Spun off from (Linux) Fedora Verified: Help Shape a New Way to Recognize Fedora Contributors | BSD Cafe Billboard
FreeBSD Project
https://framapiaf.org/@tubsta@bsdlab.au/116478621827645455
– redirects to https://social.bsdlab.au/notice/B5jMI1FY3WtTTWqvNA:
Something the #FreeBSD core team could consider. This is something that has probably been needed for a while @dch@bsd.network
My initial thoughts:
it's an awful lot to think about for a project, or team (Core, for example), that already has, I think, too much to think about.
Fedora Project
From the Proposal:
Unanswered Questions for the Fedora Community
While we have a framework, there are several major questions we need the community to answer before we move forward. Specifically, we want to know:
Validation: Should applicants be approved by grassroots peer vouches, or an elected committee?
Fairness: Does this model truly value non-code contributions equally?
Progression: How strictly structured should the path to becoming “Verified” be?
Maintenance: Should the status expire after 12 months of inactivity?
Of those four questions, the first two are huge.
https://mastodon.social/@mxenbionix/116478348932821730:
… I do have to echo some of the concerns people seem to be raising about being unclear to what this is actually solving. …
Also, the commentary at and under https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/188603/3.
