P
Welcome to anyone running or interested in running Tribblix!
Yes, it's a hobby project, but it's built to my standards which I hope are good enough to make it useful.
It would be nice to know what sorts of things people might be using Tribblix for, and what other people consider its strengths and weaknesses. (After all, it's perfect for me, by definition.)
Officially, Tribblix follows the "when I feel like it" release model. I make a release (as in a new version that requires a full upgrade) when I feel it's about time for one, rather than calendar-based or feature-based.
This tends to mean that releases come every few months - with the range being 2-6 months.
Should releases be on a more consistent timetable?
Should releases be more frequent?
Or should I just bumble along with the current model?
And on another tack, a new ISO for Tribblix on SPARC:
Can't post the numbers because I no longer have access, but I strongly suspect the OmniOS systems I built at a prior employer haven't been proactively rebooted since I left. Which would give them about 4-5 years of uptime. Even when I was there we wouldn't reboot production systems unnecessarily - and most application updates, which were the most frequent, don't really warrant a reboot.
Of course, there's an argument to be made that talking about SPARC ought to live in the Retrocomputing section.
But I still work on SPARC, have a small number of servers (a T4-1 and a couple of T5140s) that support the work. I don't expect this to be of major interest to most, but possibly the most visible part of the SPARC work I do is the OpenJDK port, which supports SPARC and x86 on Solaris and illumos. While the x86 port is current (so supports 17, 21, 25 LTS and everything in between and up to the current development of 27), SPARC goes up to JDK18 at the moment. Fortunately it's good enough to run Jenkins, which has bought people a little bit of time, although the minimum version will get bumped at some point.
@ef@mastodon.bsd.cafe Laptops are ...interesting. I've never had much access to laptop hardware, which doesn't help.
We've always had NFSv4 (as in 4.0), the latest release ought to handle NFSv4.1 too. And I ought to add encryption to the installer (the problem, as always with encryption, is handling key management).
@batcat17 Good to know my attempts to keep things simple and reliable have had some success. Although partly it's because I'm a lazy user, I really can't be fussed to deal with systems that make my life difficult.
