BSD Cafe Billboard

@santi @h3artbl33d I recently explored a github repository, discovered they used Claude to code it.Stopped using it, you never now what Claude hides inside and shares about me without me knowing it.Even without agent it is getting disturbing what one can trust or not.

@ralen Sadly yes , but have you considered zigbee2mqtt? Gateway between Zigbee dongle and MQTT server, eats ≈500 Mb of RAM (1/8 of the whole RAM in my server) and crashes immediately if connection to dongle somehow lost.It works like a shit, but somehow this is the only one "small" enough service to operate with Zigbee devices on the Unix machine. Somehow, no one wrote the Zigbee gateway with the more traditional (for embedded) language like C or Ada In comparsion with zigbee2mqtt, fail2ban looks like a good service#homelab #smarthome #zigbee

I have a small worry to share with you. Linux is powering roughly two thirds of all devices in the world. This means that Linux doesn’t only control our home computers but also servers that make up the building blocks of many critical services which our daily lives depend upon.https://linuxrenaissance.com/post/skynet-one/#ai #llm #claude #linux

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-05/msg07614.html Until now QEMU's code provenance policy declined any contribution believed to include or derive from AI-generated content. A blanket ban was easy to maintain while LLM output was rarely usable on its own, but as the tools improved an absolute prohibition has become harder to justify. … Via QEMU Shifting On AI Policy To Allow Some AI/LLM-Generated Contributions - Phoronix comments discussion in r/linux – the first comment was popular but confused, I responded mentioned in Policy for AI/LLM contributions (#697) · Issue · alpine/council boosted in BSD Cafe Mastodon. The email was copied to Warner Losh (FreeBSD), Alistair Francis (WD), Alex Bennée and Peter Maydell (Linaro), and three people at Red Hat.