<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Huge images?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The site logo (also used for a couple of forums, like this one) loads slow enough that I can see it show up. I checked and <a href="https://billboard.bsd.cafe/assets/uploads/system/site-logo.png">https://billboard.bsd.cafe/assets/uploads/system/site-logo.png</a> (with some cache-busting ?v=... suffix) is 2MB!</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm not sure if it really needs to be a 2048x2048 pixels, 24bit PNG. Same size as a 16 colors PNG: virtually identical, 390kb. Same size, but jpg: 297kb. And even that seems excessive to me for a logo that's usually scaled down to thumbnail size.</p>
]]></description><link>https://billboard.bsd.cafe/topic/135/huge-images</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 22:39:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://billboard.bsd.cafe/topic/135.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 21:37:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Huge images? on Sun, 03 May 2026 11:32:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Better: it's not possible "to use" avif or webp formats? (much lighter)</p>
]]></description><link>https://billboard.bsd.cafe/post/373</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://billboard.bsd.cafe/post/373</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[CiotBSD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 11:32:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>